The Foundations of General Relativity I and II
LPS 241R = Phil 241R


This is a two quarter course in the mathematical and conceptual foundations of the general theory of relativity. It presupposes a knowledge of basic undergraduate mathematics (calculus in several variables, linear algebra, elementary point set topology), and at least passing acquaintance with special relativity.

The course will include an exposition of the basic elements of differential geometry and general relativity. To this extent it will overlap with courses such as one standardly finds in a math or physics department. But the emphasis throughout will be on foundational issues. There will be no study of techniques for solving Einstein's equation, nor of astrophysical applications. But there will be careful consideration of the "logical structure" of the theory, its relation to Newtonian gravitation theory, the geometric interpretation of Einstein's equation, the "causal structure of spacetime", and other such topics. The comparison with Newtonian theory will exploit the possibility (first discovered by Elie Cartan) of giving the earlier theory a "geometrized" four-dimensional formulation.

Instructor: David Malament, Social Science Tower (SST),  757, 824-7374.  I can be reached most reliably by e-mail (dmalamen@uci.edu).

Office hours: by appointment.  

Reading:  My lecture notes will serve as a text for the course. They can be downloaded here.  (Please read the notes with caution. They are still in preliminary form. Corrections will be much appreciated.)   A number of recommended books are also listed for those wishing to do additional reading. 

Requirements: Auditors are welcome. But students wanting a quality grade will have to submit written work. The two quarters will have different requirements. In the first, students will be asked to submit solutions to assigned problem sets. In the second quarter, students will be asked to write a paper on some topic related to the subject matter of the course. (A few examples of topics are listed below.) Papers must be submitted by the friday of 11th week. Students are strongly urged to discuss their papers with me in advance of final submission and, if possible, to submit a preliminary draft or detailed outline for comments.


Tentative Course Outline

(What follows is table of contents for the notes as they stand at present. I do not expect to work through all of this material. In particular, I do not expect to reach the latter sections of part 4.)  

Part 1: Differential Geometry  (8 weeks?)

    1.1 Manifolds
    1.2 Tangent vectors
    1.3 Vector fields, integral curves, and flows
    1.4 Tensors and tensor fields on manifolds
    1.5 Lie derivatives
    1.6 Derivative operators and geodesics
    1.7 Curvature
    1.8 Metrics
    1.9 Hypersurfaces
    1.10 Volume elements

Part 2General Relativity   (8 weeks?)

    2.1 Relativistic Spacetimes
    2.2 Temporal Orientation
    2.3 Proper Time
    2.4 Space/Time Decomposition at a Point and Particle Dynamics
    2.5 The Energy-Momentum Field

    2.6 Electromagnetic Fields
    2.7 Einstein's equation
    2.8 Fluid Flow - Rotation and Expansion
    2.9 Killing Fields and Conserved Quantities
    2.10 The Initial Value Formulation
    2.11 Friedmann Spacetimes

Part 3Special Topics  
            (The notes for this part are not yet ready.)
   
Part 4: Newtonian Gravitation Theory  (4 weeks?)

    4.1 Classical Spacetimes
    4.2 Geometrized Newtonian Theory -- First Version
    4.3 Interpreting the Curvature Conditions
    4.4 A Solution to an Old Problem About Newtonian Cosmology
    4.5 Geometrized Newtonian Theory -- Second Version  

       


Selected References (for additional reading)

Background

    M. Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds, Benjamin, 1965 (paperback)

    E. Taylor and J. Wheeler, Spacetime Physics, Freeman, 1966 (paperback)

Differential Geometry

     R. L. Bishop and S. I. Goldberg, Tensor Analysis on Manifolds, Dover, 1980 (paperback)

    W. M . Boothby, An Introduction to Differentiable Manifolds and Riemannian Geometry, Academic Press, 1986 (paperback)

    B. O' Neill, Semi-Riemannian Geometry with Applications to Relativity, Academic Press, 1983

General Relativity

    S. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge, 1973 (paperback)

    M. Ludvigsen, General Relativity, Cambridge, 1999 (paperback)

    B. O'Neill (cited above)

    R. K. Sachs and H. Wu, General Relativity for Mathematicians, Springer, 1977

    N. Straumann, General Relativity, Springer, 2004

    R. Wald, General Relativity, Chicago, 1984 (paperback)

Works by Philosophers

    J. Earman, World Enough and Space-Time, MIT, 1989

    J. Earman, Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks, Oxford, 1995

    M. Friedman, Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Princeton, 1983 (paperback)

    R. Torretti, Relativity and Geometry, Pergamon, 1983

 


Possible Topics for Papers


(1)  The "Paradox of Centrifugal Force"
   
The cover story  of the March 1993 issue of the Scientific American, "Black Holes and the Centrifugal Force Paradox", by Marek Artur Abramowicz, begins by claiming:  "An object orbiting close to a black hole feels a centrifugal force pushing inward rather than outward."

Make the assertion precise using our notation and prove it.  (You may, if you wish, consult Abramowicz' more technical papers for guidance.  Some are cited in this one.) Also, discuss Abramowicz'  claims about the significance of this result.


(2)  How Big Was "Space" Just After the Big Bang?

This question is ambiguous. Explain why, making use of the distinction between "private space" and "public space".  For guidance, see a paper by Don Page on a closely related question:  "How Big is the Universe Today", General Relativity and Gravitation 15 (1983),  181-185.


(3)  Different Notions of "Rotation" in General Relativity

I discuss two criteria of rotation (for a ring about an axis) in "A No Go Theorem About Rotation in Relativity Theory" -- the "zero angular momentum criterion" and the "compass of inertia on the axis criterion" --  and point out that they are not equivalent, i.e., not equivalent in all spacetimes. Formulate other criteria of rotation and discuss their relation to these two.  For  guidance, see  another paper by Don Page:  "Maximal Acceleration is Non-Rotating",  Classical and Quantum Gravity 15 (1998), 1669-1719.

To be continued ... .
 

    This page has been viewed [counter] times.