Home

Upcoming Events
Colloquia
Conferences

News
People
Faculty
Graduate Students
Staff
Visitors
Courses
Fall 2010
Winter 2011
Spring 2011
Previous Years
Graduate Program
General Information
Admissions
Degree Requirements
Advising
Placement
Alumni
Undergraduate Program
Colloquia
2010-2011
Previous Years
Conferences & Workshops
Exchange Programs
Lambert Prize

Logic & Philosophy of Science Colloquium


 

John McFarlane
UC Berkeley

Ifs and Oughts

Abstract:

We consider a paradox involving indicative conditionals ("ifs") and deontic modals ("oughts"). After considering and rejecting several standard options for resolving the paradox--including rejecting various premises, positing an ambiguity or hidden contextual sensitivity, and positing a non-obvious logical form--we offer a semantics for deontic modals and indicative conditionals that resolves the paradox by making modus ponens invalid. We argue that this is a result to be welcomed on independent grounds, and we show that rejecting the general validity of modus ponens is compatible with vindicating most ordinary uses of modus ponens in reasoning. (This is joint work with Niko Kolodny.)

Friday, January 15, 2010
Humanities Gateway, Room 1010
3 pm

Refreshments will be provided




©