Logic & Philosophy of Science

Course Description


Course:  LPS/Phil 120
Name:  Metaphysics: perceiving the world
Description:  Many of us take for granted that our main access to the world is perceptual: we see, taste, touch, hear, and smell the world.  The central question of this course is, How does perception give us access to the world?  Is it direct? Are the direct objects of perception physical objects?  If so, when I see a tomato, I am in direct perceptual contact with it.  What does it even mean to say that I perceive an object directly? And what if I’m having the exact same experience that I have when I see a tomato, but I’m actually hallucinating a tomato?  In the hallucination, I’m directly aware of something, but it isn’t a physical red tomato.  Does this show that perception requires some kind of intermediary entity­that I don’t have direct perceptual access to physical objects?  What is the phenomenology of perceptual experience?  When I examine my experience, what do I find?  Consider seeing a red tomato on the table.  It certainly seems true that this visual experience is representing the world as being a certain way­it has representational content.  How do we adequately characterize the content of perception?  Do perceptual experiences have a kind of content over and above representational content, something it’s like to have the experience?